Answer:
The reasons for these two situations not handled similarly are:
1. The first case involving the sale of land is a transaction between a parent and its subsidiary. Â Their accounts are consolidated with gains from intercompany transactions eliminated because a parent company cannot recognize gains from sales to itself (group). Â This implies that all intercompany gains can only be recognized when the sales involve external or non-affiliated entities.
2. In the second case, there is no parent-subsidiary relationship since one organization is described as a non-affiliate. Â Therefore, there is no need to eliminate the intercompany profit arising from the transaction. Â Instead, the gain is recognized.
Explanation:
The accounts of companies that are under common control are consolidated by the parent entity. Â Therefore, during the consolidation process, it becomes necessary to eliminate all intercompany transactions that have not been externally affected.